Berlangganan Pro

Selasa, Maret 26, 2019

Legal Framework for Advocates Profession Programs up for Judicial Review

On 25 March 2019, the Indonesian Advocates Congress (Kongres Advokat Indonesia – “KAI”) filed a petition for an official judicial review of Regulation of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education No. 5 of 2019on Professional Advocates Programs (“Regulation 5/2019”) at the Supreme Court on the basis that it is in contradiction with Law No. 18 of 2003on Advocates (“Advocates Law”).
KAI President, Tjoetjoe Sandjaja Hernanto, has sought to draw attention to two specific issues relating to Regulation 5/2019 which he believes run contrary to the Advocates Law, specifically: 1) Regulation 5/2019 seemingly eliminates Special Education Programs for Advocates Profession (“PKPA”), as organized by advocates organizations, including the Advocates Profession Test (“UPA”) and internship requirement, as mandated under the Advocates Law; and 2) The granting of advocate titles without the need to pass the UPA, as mandated under Article 5 (2) of Regulation 5/2019, is believed to be in contradiction with Article 3 (1) of the Advocates Law.
In addition, KAI Vice President, TM Luthfi Yazid, recently declared Regulation 5/2019 to be substantially flawed due to the fact that it compromises the independence of professional advocates.
For more on this story, see Hukumonline: “Alasan KAI ‘Gugat’ Permenristekdikti Program Profesi Advokat ke MA”

......

Sudah memiliki akun? Masuk

Hukumonline Pro

Berlangganan sekarang untuk akses tak terbatas ke berbagai Analisis Hukum!

Tingkatkan kualitas penelitian hukum Anda dengan berlangganan Paket Professional Hukumonline Pro dan dapatkan lebih banyak analisis hukum untuk referensi yang komprehensif

PRO PLUS

Rp 7.500.000

per bulan

Semua Fitur Paket Professional
Layanan Penerjemahan Peraturan
Precedent Hukumonline
Virtual Discussion

PROFESSIONAL

Rp 4.500.000

per bulan

Semua Fitur Paket Standard
Terjemahan Peraturan
Peraturan Konsolidasi
Premium Stories
Monthly Law Review (MLR)
Indonesian Law Digest (ILD)

STANDARD

Rp 2.500.000

per bulan

Indonesian Legal Brief (ILB)
Daily Updates
Bantuan Layanan Pencarian Peraturan
Pusat Data Peraturan dan Putusan Pengadilan Non-Precedent

On 25 March 2019, the Indonesian Advocates Congress (Kongres Advokat Indonesia – “KAI”) filed a petition for an official judicial review of Regulation of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education No. 5 of 2019on Professional Advocates Programs (“Regulation 5/2019”) at the Supreme Court on the basis that it is in contradiction with Law No. 18 of 2003on Advocates (“Advocates Law”).
KAI President, Tjoetjoe Sandjaja Hernanto, has sought to draw attention to two specific issues relating to Regulation 5/2019 which he believes run contrary to the Advocates Law, specifically: 1) Regulation 5/2019 seemingly eliminates Special Education Programs for Advocates Profession (“PKPA”), as organized by advocates organizations, including the Advocates Profession Test (“UPA”) and internship requirement, as mandated under the Advocates Law; and 2) The granting of advocate titles without the need to pass the UPA, as mandated under Article 5 (2) of Regulation 5/2019, is believed to be in contradiction with Article 3 (1) of the Advocates Law.
In addition, KAI Vice President, TM Luthfi Yazid, recently declared Regulation 5/2019 to be substantially flawed due to the fact that it compromises the independence of professional advocates.
For more on this story, see Hukumonline: “Alasan KAI ‘Gugat’ Permenristekdikti Program Profesi Advokat ke MA”

......

Sudah memiliki akun? Masuk

Hukumonline Pro

Berlangganan sekarang untuk akses tak terbatas ke berbagai Analisis Hukum!

Tingkatkan kualitas penelitian hukum Anda dengan berlangganan Paket Professional Hukumonline Pro dan dapatkan lebih banyak analisis hukum untuk referensi yang komprehensif

PRO PLUS

Rp 7.500.000

per bulan

Semua Fitur Paket Professional
Layanan Penerjemahan Peraturan
Precedent Hukumonline
Virtual Discussion

PROFESSIONAL

Rp 4.500.000

per bulan

Semua Fitur Paket Standard
Terjemahan Peraturan
Peraturan Konsolidasi
Premium Stories
Monthly Law Review (MLR)
Indonesian Law Digest (ILD)

STANDARD

Rp 2.500.000

per bulan

Indonesian Legal Brief (ILB)
Daily Updates
Bantuan Layanan Pencarian Peraturan
Pusat Data Peraturan dan Putusan Pengadilan Non-Precedent

Latest Analysis

2024 Hak Cipta Milik Hukumonline.com