Ada Pertanyaan? Hubungi Kami 
Ada Pertanyaan? Hubungi Kami Ady Thea Dian Achmad, Mahinda Arkyasa
Six employees of PT Sarihusada Generasi Mahardika (SGM) filed a lawsuit against their employers, as well as against PT Tigaraksa Satria, which is the distributor of PT SGM products.
Budi stated that originally, the employees signed a work agreement with PT SGM to work as Nutritional Representatives (NR). However, the employees found out that their names were included in PT TigaRaksa Satria Sales invoice and that they were listed as salesmen at PT Tigaraksa Satria.
“[The applicants] are materially and immaterially harmed by PT Tigaraksa Satria’s action that caused them to do PT Tigaraksa Satria’s core activities of distributing infant formula products without a proper work agreement or proper remuneration,” Budi informed hukumonline at the South Jakarta District Court, Tuesday (2/4).
Both PT SMG’s attorney Ngurah Anditya Ari Firnanda and PT Tigakarsa Satria’s attorney Hornaning refused to comment on the lawsuit.
“I have just received the files this morning (2/4),” Hornaning stated.
When interviewed by hukumonline via telephone on Tuesday (2/4), Yogo Pamungkas, lecturer on Manpower Law at Universitas Trisakti, stated that to resolve the dispute, the court must first study the work agreement between the employees and PT SGM.
He concluded that the court must examine if there is any clause that assigns the employees to PT TIgakarsa Satria or states that PT SGM has the right to transfer their employees to PT Tigakarsa Satria.
(jt)
Ady Thea Dian Achmad, Mahinda Arkyasa
Six employees of PT Sarihusada Generasi Mahardika (SGM) filed a lawsuit against their employers, as well as against PT Tigaraksa Satria, which is the distributor of PT SGM products.
Budi stated that originally, the employees signed a work agreement with PT SGM to work as Nutritional Representatives (NR). However, the employees found out that their names were included in PT TigaRaksa Satria Sales invoice and that they were listed as salesmen at PT Tigaraksa Satria.
“[The applicants] are materially and immaterially harmed by PT Tigaraksa Satria’s action that caused them to do PT Tigaraksa Satria’s core activities of distributing infant formula products without a proper work agreement or proper remuneration,” Budi informed hukumonline at the South Jakarta District Court, Tuesday (2/4).
Both PT SMG’s attorney Ngurah Anditya Ari Firnanda and PT Tigakarsa Satria’s attorney Hornaning refused to comment on the lawsuit.
“I have just received the files this morning (2/4),” Hornaning stated.
When interviewed by hukumonline via telephone on Tuesday (2/4), Yogo Pamungkas, lecturer on Manpower Law at Universitas Trisakti, stated that to resolve the dispute, the court must first study the work agreement between the employees and PT SGM.
He concluded that the court must examine if there is any clause that assigns the employees to PT TIgakarsa Satria or states that PT SGM has the right to transfer their employees to PT Tigakarsa Satria.
(jt)